So, as expected, the average men of Sodom were also mostly straight and often married to women. There is no inherent or environmental reason why Lot’s nation should be especially more homosexual than any other nation of the world. The men of Sodom were mainly heterosexuals who were not sexually attracted by men The story of Lot condemns xenophobic hate, not homosexual loveĪs noted elsewhere, what is denounced in this story is inhospitality and oppression, not homosexual or consensual love.ĩ. Hence the mention of male homosexual rape.Ĩ. Those visitors, especially in that ancient time, were expectedly men rather than women. Lot’s men approached men from other nations to commit hate attacks like homosexual gang rapes in the highway. The mention of male homosexual rape has a context “these MY daughters, if you would be doers” 15:71).ħ. Rather he only says “ MY people, these MY daughters (haolai banatee), they are purer 1 for you” 11:78 (cf. For example, he NEVER says “Take or marry my daughters”. In the Quranic story, Lot NEVER really offers his daughters. In the Quranic story, Lot NEVER really offers his daughters The Quranic story implies that, as the spiritual father of his people, Lot calls the daughters of his community ‘My daughters’ (note: ‘MY people! these MY daughters …’, 11:78, 15:71 also cf. Lot, as the spiritual father of his people, calls the daughters of his community ‘My daughters’ In contrast to the Pentateuchal account about Lot’s two daughters (Genesis 19:8, 19:30-36), this makes the number of ‘daughters’ unspecified and untold.ĥ. In the Quranic story of Lot, the word ‘daughters’ is in plural (banāt), not dual (bintāni, two daughters). In the Quranic story of Lot, the number of ‘daughters’ is unspecified Or was that community procreating and surviving without their women?Ĥ. There is no reason why Lot would offer his poor daughters despite the availability of the community’s own women. There is no reason why Lot would offer his daughters when there were other women No sane person would present his innocent daughters to a crowd of rapists without regard to their liking or choice – just for the sake of reforming the crowd’s sexual orientation.ģ. No sane person would throw his daughters into a crowd just to reform the crowd’s sexual behaviour No sane person on Earth, let alone a prophet of God, would willingly offer his daughters to rapists.Ģ. It is impossible that Lot would offer his daughters to a gang of homosexual rapists. No sane person would offer his daughters to be gang raped Please consider the following observations:ġ. There are many reasons why Lot cannot be really offering his own daughters to the transgressors. This reading, however, is too literal and superficial. It also assumes that this is the part that condemns homosexuality, as this is why Lot specifically offers women, as opposed to men. Now, a traditional reading of this story often assumes that Lot offered his own daughters to seduce the rapist mob when they were about to gang rape his visitors. This trend is further demonstrated by the example where the gang of transgressors blamed Lot for protecting foreigners and tried to sexually attack his visiting guests. How is this not criticized that he can simply “offer up” women of his household and see it as the lesser of the two evils? Just because he is prefixed with the word “prophet”? Could you shed some light on this?Īnswer: Earlier we noted how the people of Sodom preyed on outsiders and travellers in the worst ways, by committing hate attacks like homosexual gang rapes in the highway. Question: Another horrific thing in the traditional misinterpretation of Lot’s story which is often overlooked and overshadowed by the noise on homosexuality is that Lot offers his daughters to the people instead to spare the guests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |